Student
F-1, M-1, J-1
Weak ties to India
Family concentrated in the U.S., evasive about post-graduation plans, or no clear career plan back home. Officers read this as a signal that the applicant is more likely to stay after the program ends.
Funding that didn't hold together
Vague sponsor details, recent large deposits into the bank account before the interview, a loan still pending approval, or a stated total cost that doesn't match the program's actual tuition and living expenses.
Unclear program fit
Couldn't articulate why this specific school, why this specific program, or how it connects to the applicant's academic background and career plan. Rankings-only answers are particularly weak.
Academic-background mismatch
Applied for a program that doesn't naturally extend the applicant's prior studies or work. For example, a BCom graduate applying for an MS in Computer Science without a credible technical bridge.
Pattern of short prior U.S. stays
A history of B-visa visits that extended near the maximum allowed, or frequent U.S. trips with unclear purposes, can raise flags about long-term intent even on a fresh student application.
The biggest single factor
For students from India, the most common single trigger is unclear funding combined with unclear post-graduation plans. When officers can't see how you'll pay for the program and can't see what you'll do in India afterward, 214(b) follows.